Skip to main content

The War of Northern Aggression


Today is the 150th anniversary of the start of the War of Northern Aggression, a war in which a second-rate backwoods white-trash Illinois lawyer, elected as our 16th President, unleashed a drunkard and his crazy friend to wage total war on the South.

The Evil of Slavery

First, let me make one thing perfectly clear. Slavery is wrong. Our founding fathers knew it was wrong, yet refused to completely end the practice. Many like to hold up the U.S. Constitution as one of the finest documents mankind has ever written, yet buried within its paragraphs is an allowance for slavery (Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3):
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
The so-called Three-fifths Compromise was reached during the Philadelphia Convention between the northern and southern states, allowing for a "Federal ratio" of slaves determining representation and taxation of the southern states. The Federal ratio tilted the political power towards the South before the War of Norther Aggression; there was a preponderance of southerners elected to the Presidency, the Speakership of the House, and nominated to the Supreme Court. All that changed after the War of Northern Aggression.

It wasn't until the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, that the injustice of the three-fifths compromise was fully corrected. But the evil stain of slavery will forever remain on the Constitution.

Many will point to other causes, but slavery was the evil seed, planted at the birth of the republic, that eventually grew and helped to nurture the greater evils to come.

William Tecumseh Sherman

My father was born in Dallas, Texas and raised in Savannah from the time he was 4. I was born and raised in Atlanta. Many of my relatives, living and deceased, are and were Southern men and women. It should therefore come as no surprise that to my mind there is no greater historical villain than the man who burned Atlanta and cut a swath of fire and blood to Savannah and beyond. Except, perhaps, for the recklessly foolish Confederate General John Bell Hood, charged with defending Atlanta, whose incompetent strategies fighting Sherman led to the exhaustion of his army and Hood's abandonment of Atlanta to her fiery fate.

Many write alternate histories of the South, in which this or that battle might have changed history. If Hood had been a better general, or if a better general had been chosen to defend Atlanta, Sherman might have been defeated, or at least fought to a stalemate. Lincoln's second term was guaranteed by Sherman's bloody victory in Atlanta. If Sherman had lost, Lincoln stood a good chance of loosing to former General George B. McClellan and the Democratic party, who opposed the War of Northern Aggression and wanted peace with the South.

The Campaign for Atlanta was truly pivotal. Sherman's conquest of Atlanta helped deliver the election of 1864 to Lincoln and set in motion events that led to the further humiliation, pain and suffering inflicted on the South by the North during Reconstruction.


The Southern struggle against the unlawful conquest by the North continues to echo down through the centuries, and will for centuries more to come. One day history will truly show how the South was lied to and betrayed. One day a full accounting will be made of all the sins the North committed against the South. The South will truly triumph, and the North's descendants swept into historical oblivion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…