Skip to main content

Fedora 14, Android Development, and udev Rules

In my last post I wrote about the issues I was having with adb (Android Debug Bridge) running with ddms (Dalvik Debug Monitor Server). I no longer have the problem.

It turns out that the udev rule in 51-android.rules is needed, but it needs to be written for Fedora, not Ubuntu, or at least not as documented on Google's Android site. Here's the rule I'm currently using with this system:

SUBSYSTEM=="usb",ATTR{idVendor}=="0bb4",SYMLINK+="android_adb",MODE="0666"

I know this line works because I was tailing /var/log/messages and watching what udevd spit out every time I would make a change to 51-android.rules. If the rule was bad I would get a rule error or warning. I've also rebooted the system a number of times and brought it up cold to check the system out by looking for devices without the phone plugged in to plugging the phone in and checking each individual Android SDK subsystem to make sure they perform as expected. And now they all do.

With this line in 51-android.rules there is no need to perform, as root, an adb kill-server followed by an adb start server. Now, if I bring up ddms first and plug in the phone or have it plugged in already, then ddms properly displays the Android device information. Life is good. Time to move on to something productive.

Update

Nothing especially fabulous. Just quickly created a virtual device to act as my HTC myTouch development sandbox. With all the windows floating around on the desktop, some of the Compiz extensions help in finding things on the desktop (even though this isn't nearly as crowded as it could get, and I'm not using all my available desktops). And, yes, it looks cool.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…