Skip to main content

Some Startups Should Be Avoided

A Series of Tubes
"A Series of Tubes"
Olympus E-3 with Zuiko Digital 12-60mm
1/160s, f/4.5, ISO 100, 60mm, -1 EV
[I wrote the original version of this post on 27 March with a different, more confrontational title. I then deleted the original on 29 March. This 2.0 version has had some of the rougher edges filed down. My reasons for doing this I keep to myself.]

There's a blog posting loose on the Internet titled "Why we don’t hire .NET programmers" by David Barrett, CEO of Expensify. David Barrett's posting is a classically trollish post illustrating several key flaws found in too many startup founders: a toxic mix of exaggerated self-importance and an unreasoning bias against Microsoft technologies.

David Barrett's exaggerated self-importance is quite evident if you look at his company's website. The company, Expensify, is dedicated to producing an expense reporting module for Salesforce and Google apps.

With all the money they've raised along with all the trash-talk about .Net programmers (and Microsoft in general) and the boasting about the staff, you'd think they were working on a truly hard problem such as practical parallelism or new and novel extensions to artificial intelligence, not a new way to do web-based expense reports for

Yes, a gilded web-based expense report. If you read the description of what the company's one and only product does, its first key capability is it "imports expenses and receipts straight from your credit card or bank account." While it appears they get it with regards to security (at least they have a web page covered with security totems) when accessing sensitive information, when you eliminate the human-in-the-loop you increase the chances for other classes of mistakes. Just because you can automate a process doesn't make it any more mistake proof than the process you've replaced.

The piece is larded with left-handed compliments towards Microsoft and .Net. On the one hand "it's dandy", but on the other hand "startups, by definition, need to think of things from new angles, and those angles typically don’t involve .NET." A position which he fails to prove either with solid facts or with his "simile", which, by the way, is actually a metaphor.

Startups should innovate on top of existing software tools irregardless of their provenance. Everything in the IT landscape should be grist for a startup's mill. .Net isn't a language, it's a broad umbrella covering Microsoft's collection of technologies that include languages (C# being the most prominent), underlying infrastructure (CLI/CLR), all the supporting libraries (which you can use or discard as needed), system plumbing, cloud connectivity, tools, and applications that run on top of it all. Startups should understand this, deconstruct it, and incorporate those elements that make sense into their creative plans. This incorporation and re-use is equally applicable to other software technologies, such as Java and Java Enterprise, C++ and the multitude of frameworks such as Qt, Ruby and Rails, Python and Django and Zope, etc, etc, etc. Whatever it takes to fulfill the mission.

Startups should tackle tough, seemingly impossible to solve problems, not pursue some trivial opportunistic angle a buzzword-compliant marketing droid could think up. The only bias a startup should have is against closed minds. Startups should be focused on their primary goal but be aware enough to avoid the technological cliff edges that dogmatic blindness can hide and be nimble enough to execute a course change when change is called for. I see none of this in Expensify, either by reading the CEO's posting or by looking at the Expensify website.

This is neither a company I would want to work for nor is it a company I would recommend to others.

Update 28 March

An amazingly eloquent and humorous refutation: "Why I Don’t Hang Out With People Named David". How I so wish I could write like that.

Update #2, 28 March

An articulate and well-written post that explains what the real problem may be with people who select .Net. I don't agree with what he says, but the presentation is professional and far less confrontational than Barrett's. "Corporate stereotypes, and why Microsoft could kill your startup career" is a thought-provoking piece written by Matt Swanson, who understands how to professionally present his arguments. Swanson is CTO of SpeakerText, what looks to be a pretty interesting startup.


Popular posts from this blog

A Decade Long Religious Con Job

I rarely write inflammatory (what some might call trolling) titles to a post, but this building you see before you deserves it. I've been seeing this building next to I-4 just east of Altamonte/436 and Crane's Roost for nearly 12 years, and never knew who owned it. Today on a trip up to Lake Mary with my wife I saw it yet again. That's when I told her I wanted to stop by on the way back and poke around the property, and photograph any parts of it if I could.

What I discovered was this still unfinished eighteen story (I counted) white elephant, overgrown with weeds and yet still under slow-motion construction. It looks impressive with its exterior glass curtain walls, but that impression is quickly lost when you see the unfinished lower stories and look inside to the unfinished interior spaces.

A quick check via Google leads to an article written in 2010 by the Orlando Sentinel about the Majesty Tower. Based on what I read in the article it's owned by SuperChannel 55 WA…

Be Careful of Capital One Mailings

Capitol One ("What's in your wallet?") sent me a bit of deceptive snail mail today. I felt sure it was a credit card offer, and sure enough, it was. I open all credit card offers and shred them before putting them in the trash. Normally I just scan the front to make sure I don't miss anything; the Capital One offer made me stop for a moment and strike a bit of fear into my heart.

The letter's opening sentence read:
Our records as of December 30, 2009 indicate your Capital One Platinum MasterCard offer is currently valid and active.Not paying close attention during the first reading, I quickly developed this irrational worry that I was actually on the hook for something important, but I wasn't quite sure what. The letter listed "three ways to reply" at the bottom; via phone, the internet, and regular snail mail. I elected to call.

Once I reached the automated phone response system, the first entry offered was '1', to "activate my Capital …

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…