Skip to main content

Canon Makes Ready to Release Another Blasé Camera

Under normal circumstances it's down right impossible to ignore a new, unannounced camera, especially if it's from one of the majors, in this instance Canon. Especially if the images are sitting in someone's Flickr stream. But after looking at the images on line and reading the minimal amount of specification information, my reaction to the new camera is "so what?"

It looks to be based on an APS-C class sensor, although some rumors have said it would re-use the Canon G1-X's sensor, Canon's 18mm by 14mm 4:3 aspect ration sensor (µ4/3rds is 17mm by 13mm). I believe it is APS-C because 22mm x 1.5 gives us 33mm, which is in the classic 35mm domain (Olympus' M.Zuiko 1:2.8/17mm is equivalent to 17mm x 2 or 34mm).
The zoom to be announced with the the body is identical, focal-length wise, to Sony's. Scrutinizing the lens in larger format, the filter size is 52mm, larger than Sony's zoom's 49mm filter size. That means this so-called compact zoom will be larger than Sony's, which was large enough.

I don't know if that's a metal mount or silver plastic at the base of the zoom. As I mentioned I don't know the apertures, but considering that the entrance lens is noticably larger than Sony's I would hope that it's maximimum apertures might run f/2.8 to f/4, rather than the typical (from all parties) f/3.5 to f/5.6. An extra stop of light-gathering speed at both ends would be nice to have. The 22mm (35mm equivalent) is a stop faster than the equivalent M.Zuiko, and a full stop faster than Sony's 1:2.8/16mm (24mm equivalent). Of course, the Sony lens has a much wider field of view than the Canon, but still, Sony could have produced an f/2 vs f/2.8, just like Olympus could have certainly produced an f/2 17mm instead of an f/2.8. Everybody seems to be in the mode to build cheap and charge dearly, including Olympus and Panasonic.

It is interesting to see this camera and its peripherals. This explains the step fall in prices for the Olympus E-P2, E-PL1, and E-PL2. Those cameras had hung at fairly high retail until April, when the prices took a step dive. Considering how Canon charges a pretty penny for mediocre results (the G1-X started at $800, and is now down about $100 to $700), I have a pretty good idea that it will come in around the $800 price range for the body and a lens.

Perhaps Canon will surprise me and release this camera as weather-sealed, with a magnesium internal body and some compelling feature to make me want to own one. I doubt that very much. And simply stamping "Canon" on the exterior isn't compelling enough either. If that were the case I'd be owning and using Canon DSLRs, and that ain't gonna happen, not in my lifetime.

Well, let's wait and see what turns up officially on Monday. I can wait. Really, I can.


Popular posts from this blog

A Decade Long Religious Con Job

I rarely write inflammatory (what some might call trolling) titles to a post, but this building you see before you deserves it. I've been seeing this building next to I-4 just east of Altamonte/436 and Crane's Roost for nearly 12 years, and never knew who owned it. Today on a trip up to Lake Mary with my wife I saw it yet again. That's when I told her I wanted to stop by on the way back and poke around the property, and photograph any parts of it if I could.

What I discovered was this still unfinished eighteen story (I counted) white elephant, overgrown with weeds and yet still under slow-motion construction. It looks impressive with its exterior glass curtain walls, but that impression is quickly lost when you see the unfinished lower stories and look inside to the unfinished interior spaces.

A quick check via Google leads to an article written in 2010 by the Orlando Sentinel about the Majesty Tower. Based on what I read in the article it's owned by SuperChannel 55 WA…

Be Careful of Capital One Mailings

Capitol One ("What's in your wallet?") sent me a bit of deceptive snail mail today. I felt sure it was a credit card offer, and sure enough, it was. I open all credit card offers and shred them before putting them in the trash. Normally I just scan the front to make sure I don't miss anything; the Capital One offer made me stop for a moment and strike a bit of fear into my heart.

The letter's opening sentence read:
Our records as of December 30, 2009 indicate your Capital One Platinum MasterCard offer is currently valid and active.Not paying close attention during the first reading, I quickly developed this irrational worry that I was actually on the hook for something important, but I wasn't quite sure what. The letter listed "three ways to reply" at the bottom; via phone, the internet, and regular snail mail. I elected to call.

Once I reached the automated phone response system, the first entry offered was '1', to "activate my Capital …

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…