Skip to main content

Is Apple Already Dying?

Image by Jonathan Mak Long
It's now 48 hours since The Steve shufflel'd off his mortall iCoile. During that period I've been asked, more than once, how long Apple would last now that Steve was gone.

Every time my honest answer was "I don't know. If I did know I'd invest accordingly and become a millionaire."

So, with that in mind, I'm going to speculate on the future of Apple. Not that it'll make me rich, but because I have my own opinion as to where Apple is and where it's going. But first, a quick review of the past.

Apple has already gone through a period of Stevelessness from 1985 through 1997. Apple's first golden age occurred during this period from 1989 to 1991. But after that heady period Apple began to slide downwards both in terms of profitability and relevance. It was during this slide that the OS debacles began and the Newton was released. Product flops and missed deadlines took the luster off the Apple, which led to a series of CEOs from Sculley to Spindler to Amelio and finally back to Jobs in 1997.

During that period Apple rose to its greatest height and then cratered rather spectacularly, to the point where Micheal Dell told a crowd in October 1997 that Apple should be shut down and the money given back to the shareholders. Dell's comment came right after Jobs had taken control again, and speculation was rife that Jobs return would finish Apple off. History and hindsight show what really happened; by January 2006 Apple's stock market valuation had passed Dell's, in part due to Apple's rise and in part to Dell's decline.

The current generation at Apple knows this very well. After suffering a near-death experience and subsequent rescue by Steve, Apple has had it infused into its very corporate fiber to Do What Jobs Wants. Jobs has reinforced this with his careful selection and nurturing of his lieutenants, starting with Tim Cook and moving down. Apple the corporate entity doesn't want a repeat of the First Period of Stevelessness. Unfortunately, Death comes to us all and this second period is rather permanent.

Apple may have already hit its peak. Steve has been ill since 2005, and he's been in and out of the captains chair since 2008, when he took his first medical leave. The second one in January, followed by his stepping down in August, was the worst and longest. With Steve's death, Apple is setup to fall into a period of stagnation very similar to what hit Disney when Walt Disney died. It wouldn't surprise me to hear in the halls of Apple "what would Steve do", just like it wasn't unusual to hear "what would Walt do?" For Disney, it stayed stagnant for quite some time, and then it hired Eisner.

With all of this I don't believe that the release of the iPhone 4S is the sign of impending doom. The iPhone 4S was Steve's last effort. The release date of iPhones has always been yearly, with a major release spanning two years; iPhone 3G July 2008, iPhone 3GS June 2009, iPhone 4 June 2010, and the iPhone 4S October 2011. There is a definite pattern there. The iPhone 5, if Apple follows this pattern, will be released next year. What features it may have I have no clue. I can only prognosticate releases based on history, which looks pretty darn clear. It's the release of the iPhone 5 that will be pretty telling, both the date and what's in the iPhone.

With apologies to William Shakespeare's Hamlet

"What dreames may come, When we haue shufflel'd off this mortall coile, Must giue vs pawse."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…