Skip to main content

New Old Gear

In spite of my rants to the contrary, I spent some more money on a couple of used Four Thirds items; a second FL-50R flash and an Olympus EC-14 1.4x teleconverter.

Olympus EC-14

Both came from the same photographer who decided to sell his extensive Olympus Four Thirds system and move on to a Nikon D3 system. With my limited budget the best I could do was pick up the teleconverter and the flash (although I sure wish I could have picked up some of the SHG lenses he was selling).

My biggest reason for purchasing the EC-14 was to add a few more millimeters of focal length to the far end of my 50-200mm. With the EC-14 my 50-200mm becomes a 70-280mm f:4-5 telephoto zoom. In practice the E-3 detects the lens as a 70-283mm f:4-4.9. It's interesting how the measured values are slightly off on the far end of the range.

Construction Workers
Construction Workers
Olympus E-3 w/50-200mm + EC-14
1/320s. f/4.9, ISO 100, 258mm

In general use the E-3+50-200+EC-14 is no different in handling than the E-3+50-200mm. With the EC-14 I can now reach a little farther than before. That means I can fill the frame better at the same distances, or stand back a little farther than before (whether it's a 12 foot gator at one of the parks or a radar speedtrap).

The image above was taken wide open, hand-held, at base ISO. No special post processing, it was converted straight from the raw file. The focus was reasonably accurate and the shutter speed was right above the minimum recommended reciprocal for the focal length (258mm).

Ol' Blue
Ol' Blue
17mm missing front cosmetic piece

And finally, another shot of my slightly busted M.Zuiko 17mm, which I've given the nick-name Ol' Blue, for the bright blue plastic ring that is now fully exposed on the front of the lens. For both the EC-14 and this image I used remote control with the E-3. Both flashes were set up with one flash 45° to my left, with the second 180° on the right back side. For both images the front flash used the bounce card that comes with the FL-50R. For the EC-14 the rear flash was direct and 1/2 the output of the front flash. For the 17mm both flashes were set to the same power level and both were using the bounce card. The "background", if you want to call it that, was a single piece of 8x11" white printer paper.

There are times when I need to photograph small pieces of hardware, and the second flash will make it easier to do this. I had thought of purchasing a ring flash, but this has turned out to be cheaper and more flexible for other types of photography. And it's more fun to learn how to do lighting with two flash units as powerful as the FL-50Rs.

I wish I had the budget to invest multiple thousands of more dollars into another system (Canon 5D or Nikon D700, for example). But I don't so I can't. And the two items I just purchased used were cheap enough to fill in some capability gaps in the gear I currently have. And I might mention that even though both items were used, they were in immaculate condition. Their used prices were 40% less than brand new. And I can certainly live with that.


  1. I'm in a similar situation to you - I wish I had the money to invest in a switch ... but then again, I'm not so sure. There isn't really a system which offers quite what Olympus (still) offers me, although of course there are all sorts of caveats on that. I can't see a realistic alternative to the 50-200 anywhere else, for a start, except maybe from Pentax. And that would be jumping from the frying pan into the fire. In real world use I can't say that there are many photos that I've lost because I chose Olympus. And just because development of 4/3 seems to be at an end, it doesn't mean what is available today is useless, nor that it has no future usefulness.

    By the way, you should try the EC-20 on the 50-200 as well if you get a chance. It works beautifully.

  2. Good purchase, Bill, and I'm quite jealous of your 50-200 (tho the 40-150mm certainly isn't bad, and could even be considered a great bargain, yours is in another league me thinks).

    I found these Olympus flashes too expensive, so I got an 'el cheapo' Yongnuo YN-460II, and learned to live without TTL. That thing works so well that I later bought a second one for Mitchie (my wife, who has an E-PL1). And even my latest purchase, a 300Ws studio flash was way cheaper than any of those Olympus system flashes (200€ with a 9 ft. stand and a 36" octabox).

    I thought about switching as well, but first, my Olympus more or less provides everything I need so far, and secondly, I can't spend anything on photo gear right now. So a D700 or a 5D2 or a D7k have to wait until I really would need something like that. Plus I would sooo miss my macro. And those buttons on my E-520 which I reach 'blind', with the eye to the VF.

    No, my Oly works quite well at base ISO or - if you expose carefully enough - up to ISO 400.


Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

A Decade Long Religious Con Job

I rarely write inflammatory (what some might call trolling) titles to a post, but this building you see before you deserves it. I've been seeing this building next to I-4 just east of Altamonte/436 and Crane's Roost for nearly 12 years, and never knew who owned it. Today on a trip up to Lake Mary with my wife I saw it yet again. That's when I told her I wanted to stop by on the way back and poke around the property, and photograph any parts of it if I could.

What I discovered was this still unfinished eighteen story (I counted) white elephant, overgrown with weeds and yet still under slow-motion construction. It looks impressive with its exterior glass curtain walls, but that impression is quickly lost when you see the unfinished lower stories and look inside to the unfinished interior spaces.

A quick check via Google leads to an article written in 2010 by the Orlando Sentinel about the Majesty Tower. Based on what I read in the article it's owned by SuperChannel 55 WA…

Be Careful of Capital One Mailings

Capitol One ("What's in your wallet?") sent me a bit of deceptive snail mail today. I felt sure it was a credit card offer, and sure enough, it was. I open all credit card offers and shred them before putting them in the trash. Normally I just scan the front to make sure I don't miss anything; the Capital One offer made me stop for a moment and strike a bit of fear into my heart.

The letter's opening sentence read:
Our records as of December 30, 2009 indicate your Capital One Platinum MasterCard offer is currently valid and active.Not paying close attention during the first reading, I quickly developed this irrational worry that I was actually on the hook for something important, but I wasn't quite sure what. The letter listed "three ways to reply" at the bottom; via phone, the internet, and regular snail mail. I elected to call.

Once I reached the automated phone response system, the first entry offered was '1', to "activate my Capital …

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…