Skip to main content

Why I still reach for the E-P2

Two generations - E-P2 on the left, OM-4T on the right, and over 20 years in between.

I've been less than thrilled lately with the Olympus Camera Company. Because of the way they've handled the regular Four Thirds camera line, releasing just one overly expensive regular Four Thirds body to placate the regular users while they've poured all their resources into the µFour Thirds side, they've burned up all trust I had in them. They made a business choice, and in the process left me out in the cold.

I had originally thought that they would keep regular and  µFour Third lines going as equals, eventually merging the two into one. Along the way I hoped they would provide good engineering solutions for the older design (Four Third) lenses and accessories to be easily integrated and used with the µFour Thirds bodies. But that's not how it's turning out.

So I'm left with a collection of bodies (an E-300, E-3, two E-1s and an E-P2), lenses, and accessories that are still quite functional.

What I've noticed is that of all the bodies I still have (an E-1, the E-3, and the E-P2; I gave the other E-1 and E-300 to my youngest daughter) I keep reaching for the E-P2.

Of all the bodies, the E-P2 is the closest in size and shape to my even older OM-4T. Even with the 35-70mm lens attached, the OM-4T's easy and fun to carry around. With both cameras it's easy for me to wrap one hand around the body with a lens attached.

The E-P2's the smallest, easiest to carry of the three digital camera bodies. With either the 17mm or the 14-42 collapsible lenses mounted it's a far tidier and lighter package than either the E-1 or E-3. It makes for a more practical package to carry, and it's far less obvious when in use.

Until such time as I become flush with cash and a competitive camera manufacturer releases a clearly affordable and superior model to what I currently have then I'll be kicking along with what I've already got. It's paid for and I know how it works. Right now, that's good enough.

Comments

  1. I feel similarly. I started with an OM1 and now only have an OM10. Its interesting to see how similar the form factor of the Panasonic G1/G2 cameras is to that old OM10

    http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2010/02/digital-and-compact.html

    but I still feel we're getting the raw end of the deal and we should be able to get cameras like the size of the pentax 110 (which shares the same size sensor as the 4/3)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Same position here too. I have the E620 and a collection of those excellent lenses. What do they expect us to do now? Surely an E650 with no mirror and an embedded EVF would make an attractive concept to both 4/3 and u4/3 camps. Wake up Oly :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…