Skip to main content

Question to Dennis Howlett: Why are you so bloody stupid?

In a post titled "Question to Mozilla CEO: what do you fear?", blogger Dennis "Howler Monkey" Howlett tries to back up a very important question with out-and-out gross distortions of the facts. For example, in the first paragraph:
The kerfuffle over Apple’s decision to include the Safari 3.1 ‘update’ with an iTunes update installer for Windows made me smile. John Lilly, CEO Mozilla Foundation seems outraged at Apple’s decision. It only adds to the hilarity. Why? In enterprise land, neither browser is likely to be the number one choice down at the PC/laptop image factory. Not even close. Check the stats at W3schools to see what I mean. Mozilla comes in at a miniscule 1.1% while Safari has just hit the 2% mark.
I did check the stats over at W3schools, and you know what I found? Mozilla (Moz) does indeed come in with a mizerly 1.1%. But look over to the left column next to it labeled Fx (for Firefox) and you see that Firefox has a 36.5% share. Add the two together and you get 37.6%. That's a good third of the market.

Earth to Howler: The Mozilla Foundation is responsible for both the Firefox and Mozilla browsers, and it's been primarily (and now exclusively) Firefox for years now. Where the hell have you been?

The the Howler Monkey further howls:
And while I’m in Mozilla flame mode, exactly when will Firefox stop leaking memory like a sieve by default and routinely bringing my machine to a grinding halt? That would be a much better story in my opinion because right now I’d prefer to use Safari, short though it may be on all those Firefox plug-ins, add-ons and themes. Why? Because in enterprise land, performance matters, not all the bells and whistles.
Let's talk about memory leaks for a moment. I'll be the first to admit that Firefox consumes memory like a drunk in a licker store. But is Safari 3.1 any better? Let's take a look, shall we?

Oh my goodness! Safari running on my Windows XP SP2 system, with six tabs, consumes almost 400MB. Firefox 2, while by no means svelte, consumes in the high 200s on this system, and that's with considerably more tabs open to the same sites. Why is this? Because I use three Firefox plug-ins to keep memory consumption down on my systems: Adblock Plus 0.7.5.3, Adblock Filterset.G Updater 0.3.1.3, and NoScript 1.5.2. These three plug-ins keep ads, especially Flash-based ads, off my web pages. Safari, with nothing like them, renders everything, and in the process sucks up even more memory than Firefox 2.

Safari 3.1 on Windows is indeed a good, fast browser with regards to speed and quality of rendering. But when it comes to overall quality, Firefox 2 is as good if not better. Safari provides yet another choice for browsing, but as for me, I'll happily stick with Firefox.

Comments

  1. I'm in a posting mood this weekend Bill,
    LOVED the put-down! Its so reasoned it makes the offender look like a second-rate whinger LOL - I've never used safari but I know YOU don't talk S**T! As for firefox well i've been using it since before its official launch and its the best for me.
    Addendum: I use the foxmarks addin which stores my bookmarks on a webstore - its great to create a new OS setup and just load them down (whatever OS i'm using)
    But your putdown - Great Fun Bill

    ReplyDelete
  2. Outstanding post Bill, it's always like the MS Fan boys to distort the facts. Great post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That guy can lecture us all about how to completely miss the point.


    If Microsoft did this they would have the EU on their back already, apple's abuse of their music player monopoly must stop.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…