Skip to main content

First Amendement Rights

Nearly two years ago I wrote an opinion piece about Groklaw and its editor, Pamela Jones (PJ). Let me quote the pertinent paragraph:
PJ, however, has done more than just report the facts of the case. She's editorialized. She's injected her opinion into the Groklaw documentation. And she's made some pointed observations about the players in this drama, one of whom is our own gentle MoG. I have no problems with PJ voicing her opinions. She has her First Amendment rights just like anyone else. The problem is that she wants to hide while she does it, and that's not right.
Now let's quote the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to partition the Government for a redress of grievances.
In this case abridging means the act of lessening, reducing, or depriving. I take note of the fact that the word "anonymous" does not appear anywhere in that statement.

PJ and her supporters want to attack SCOX (and just about anyone else who speaks any ill against PJ and Groklaw) with anonymous impunity. I note for the record that when SCOX wanted to serve a subpoena with regards to matters concerning SCOX vs. Novell, that PJ suddenly took ill and no longer posted on Groklaw. Instead, another person named MathFox took her place. She's surfaced most recently, but stated in her latest post "Yes, this is me. No. I'm not really back. I'm still sick, but I sat up long enough to do this." I'd link to the story, but linking into Groklaw is blocked by the Groklaw sight. How convenient.

I bring this back up because of a similar story closer to home in St. Augustine. As reported here, an editor tried to identify the individual behind a blog who was highly critical of a local politician. The local politician is by all accounts no saint. But let me quote the appropriate paragraphs from this story:
The Record, believing Padgett to be part of an organized political group out to unseat Rich, not merely a lonely pamphleteer voicing his displeasure with a public official, decided that making public Padgett's identity was the right to do.

They were correct. While there may be a long-held and cherished right to publish anonymously in this country, it isn't any more absolute than other First Amendment rights and should never be confused with a right to remain anonymous. After all, there was never anything stopping the lonely pamphleteer's neighbors from saying, "Hey, that looks a lot like farmer Ben's handwriting."

Truth be told, the Record didn't need a high-minded rational for outing Padgett. The mere fact that the man had kicked up public attention - made himself a person of public interest - makes him fair game for being identified...
Change the politician to SCOX, and the 'lonely blogger' from Lee Padgett to Pamela Jones, and it suddenly looks very much like our own Groklaw drama.

PJ has certainly made herself "a person of public interest" in this long-term court fight. She's been the lead fighter in the court of public opinion with regards to SCOX. The facts of the case that Groklaw has documented are invaluable, if true. But PJ's constant desire to remain hidden and essentially unknown is unfair and unwarranted. While the court of public opinion is certainly no court of law (nor should it be), there is, in the Six Amendment, with regards to prosecutions, states this important right: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall... be confronted with the witnesses against him..."

What applies to the court of law should apply to the court of public opinion. In a long fight such as this one, the desire to remain hidden while voicing strong editorial opinions, especially when they are at times inflammatory, is morally and ethically corrupt, and lessons the stature of the person making them as well as those who support that individual. Everyone else in this drama is publicly identified, and has had that public information used against them, specifically by the more vocal and emotional Groklaw supporters. PJ, since her debut in 2003, has become a very public individual in a very important and emotionally charged fight, a fight she helped to stoke with her actions and her posts. If she has wanted to remain anonymous she should have stayed to strictly reporting the facts of the case. The day may yet come when many in the Linux community realize that her actions combined with her hiding have damaged the facts presented by Groklaw, and by association, the reputation of Linux and the Linux community. PJ has crossed the line from asset to liability, not only to Groklaw, but to Linux.


  1. Fully one week after Record editor Peter Ellis claims to have learned the nefarious blogger's identity, the paper has still hasn't revealed this vital information to its readers. Could Ellis be blowing smoke, or does he have some reason for sitting on what is obviously Pulitzer-prize-winning material?

    As they say: We report, you decide.


Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

A Decade Long Religious Con Job

I rarely write inflammatory (what some might call trolling) titles to a post, but this building you see before you deserves it. I've been seeing this building next to I-4 just east of Altamonte/436 and Crane's Roost for nearly 12 years, and never knew who owned it. Today on a trip up to Lake Mary with my wife I saw it yet again. That's when I told her I wanted to stop by on the way back and poke around the property, and photograph any parts of it if I could.

What I discovered was this still unfinished eighteen story (I counted) white elephant, overgrown with weeds and yet still under slow-motion construction. It looks impressive with its exterior glass curtain walls, but that impression is quickly lost when you see the unfinished lower stories and look inside to the unfinished interior spaces.

A quick check via Google leads to an article written in 2010 by the Orlando Sentinel about the Majesty Tower. Based on what I read in the article it's owned by SuperChannel 55 WA…

Be Careful of Capital One Mailings

Capitol One ("What's in your wallet?") sent me a bit of deceptive snail mail today. I felt sure it was a credit card offer, and sure enough, it was. I open all credit card offers and shred them before putting them in the trash. Normally I just scan the front to make sure I don't miss anything; the Capital One offer made me stop for a moment and strike a bit of fear into my heart.

The letter's opening sentence read:
Our records as of December 30, 2009 indicate your Capital One Platinum MasterCard offer is currently valid and active.Not paying close attention during the first reading, I quickly developed this irrational worry that I was actually on the hook for something important, but I wasn't quite sure what. The letter listed "three ways to reply" at the bottom; via phone, the internet, and regular snail mail. I elected to call.

Once I reached the automated phone response system, the first entry offered was '1', to "activate my Capital …

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…