Skip to main content

An Open Letter to The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA)

Dear Sirs

Enough is enough. I am a college professor who has built my professional career on fairness and equality in education and life. In education one of the caveats for maintaining a positive learning environment is the same as in life: if a negative element is introduced in the environment, it is acted upon immediately before it becomes a problem. After that, the incident is not dredged up because such behavior on the part of the person in control is noxious to the situation. To put it in cliched terms "Nip it in the bud" and "Stop beating a dead horse". If your body was privy to information that was germane to the United States Justice Department's inquiry of Armstrong, then your organization was compelled by law to turn over whatever information or tangible proof to that government agency for its inquiry. When the inquiry was dropped, then the question of egregious behavior in Armstrong's past should have put the matter to rest forever. After all, the Justice Department acts under the auspices of the nation's highest legal prosecutor, the Attorney General. If there has been a recent case or cases of doping, then that evidence needs to be addressed, but the salient point here is "recent".

I cannot speak for the general public, of course, but I can speak for myself and those I have talked to about this action. It comes across as demonizing a figure and creating a witch hunt. This certainly puts your organization in a, at best, questionable light. With as much current doping in athletics, stay focused: go after those numbers who are currently abusing themselves and make full disclosure to the public of what evidence/information that you possess before applying draconian measures. Presently, it appears that you have lost the confidence in the public arena. For me, I think of the Inquisition or Joe McCarthy's shameful railing's of the 50's. Remember that each piece of populace feedback represents the views of at least 3,500 others who don't communicate directly, but who do network with others who also network with their cohorts, ad infinitum, who ultimately shape public opinion and who exert power as to what agencies are necessary in our society and what agencies are irrelevant, redundant and need to be abolished.

Enough said,
Judy Shank


This open letter was written by my wife. We share the exact same sentiments on this subject. We have followed Lance Armstrong since his early days in racing, through his fight with cancer, and on through his competitions in the Tour de France. In all that time all we've ever seen is a truly courageous champion overcome all the odds to win a personal fight with a deadly form of cancer and then seven tours, more than any other athlete. Through all that time we've heard the steady drumbeat of accusations about his so-called doping, only to have the evidence come up inconclusive at best, manufactured at worst. Armstrong is absolutely right to call out USADA for "its malice, its methods, its star-chamber practices, and its decision to punish first and adjudicate later." It has testimony from "ten cyclists" that will never be cross-examined, who's word will be taken without proper challenge in any kind of court, let alone a court of law unless Armstrong chooses to pursue the ten cyclists along with the USADA.

If Armstrong has truly "had enough," if as he says he's now past all of this, if he simply gives up and lets the USADA strip him of his seven titles, then the USADA will be guilty of giving in to jealous gossips and wrongfully taking from a champion what all others could not take in honest competition. For the USADA to literally wait until the last minute to file these charges shows just how shaky their evidence truly is. For if the USADA had real evidence of Armstrong's so-called guilt then they would have certainly delivered it before now, and more significantly, it would have factored into the Justice Department's two year investigation of Lance Armstrong, which Justice chose not to pursue because in the end there was nothing worth pursuing.

I truly hope and pray Lance Armstrong perseveres with this latest smear against his reputation. He deserves to keep his seven titles. As for the USADA, they no longer have any reputation to smear. By their current actions they have managed to totally destroy their own reputation.


Popular posts from this blog

A Decade Long Religious Con Job

I rarely write inflammatory (what some might call trolling) titles to a post, but this building you see before you deserves it. I've been seeing this building next to I-4 just east of Altamonte/436 and Crane's Roost for nearly 12 years, and never knew who owned it. Today on a trip up to Lake Mary with my wife I saw it yet again. That's when I told her I wanted to stop by on the way back and poke around the property, and photograph any parts of it if I could.

What I discovered was this still unfinished eighteen story (I counted) white elephant, overgrown with weeds and yet still under slow-motion construction. It looks impressive with its exterior glass curtain walls, but that impression is quickly lost when you see the unfinished lower stories and look inside to the unfinished interior spaces.

A quick check via Google leads to an article written in 2010 by the Orlando Sentinel about the Majesty Tower. Based on what I read in the article it's owned by SuperChannel 55 WA…

Be Careful of Capital One Mailings

Capitol One ("What's in your wallet?") sent me a bit of deceptive snail mail today. I felt sure it was a credit card offer, and sure enough, it was. I open all credit card offers and shred them before putting them in the trash. Normally I just scan the front to make sure I don't miss anything; the Capital One offer made me stop for a moment and strike a bit of fear into my heart.

The letter's opening sentence read:
Our records as of December 30, 2009 indicate your Capital One Platinum MasterCard offer is currently valid and active.Not paying close attention during the first reading, I quickly developed this irrational worry that I was actually on the hook for something important, but I wasn't quite sure what. The letter listed "three ways to reply" at the bottom; via phone, the internet, and regular snail mail. I elected to call.

Once I reached the automated phone response system, the first entry offered was '1', to "activate my Capital …

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…