Skip to main content

Everybody loves to hate Microsoft

There's no love lost between partisans of Linux and Microsoft. The war between the two has been going on for as long as Linux has been in existence. The war was fanned to a fever pitch with the 2003 SCOX vs. IBM lawsuit, and it's stayed at that level ever since.

It's totally unsurprising, therefore, that Microsoft's delayed release of Vista would have the anti-Microsoft forces watching gleefully for any signs of stress, internal or external, at Microsoft. Schadenfreude is alive and well and practiced with raucous enthusiasm by many Linux partisans.

Microsoft has no-one to blame for this but itself. Since it's inception 30 years ago, Microsoft has played a brutal game of hardball with competitor and partner alike. The ultimate example of this was Microsoft's treatment of IBM during the initial development of OS/2. IBM and Microsoft were partners until it became obvious that Windows would suite Microsoft's purposes better than OS/2. Microsoft developed and marketed Windows, competing against OS/2. This culminated with the release of Windows 95, where Microsoft finally buried OS/2 once and for all. Windows 95's win over OS/2 was a text-book example of Microsoft FUD versus IBM marketing ineptitude.

Microsoft's business practices go hand-in-hand with their software practices: promise features to keep back the competition, then deliver very little and deliver it late. Such as, for example, Vista, the next greatest version of Windows. Vista is not the first delayed release of Windows. The predecessor to Windows XP, Windows 2000, was paper launched in December 1999. It had been in development for over five years. The other significant problem with Vista, its loss of pre-announced features, is also shared by earlier releases. In fact, the one feature that has forever been added and dropped is an advance file system. Starting in 1994 with Cairo (Windows NT 4), Windows NT was supposed to ship with Object File Store, or OFS. It was supposed to provide a foundation for advanced features, such as search. Sound familiar? It should. It was dusted off and added to Longhorn's features in 2002. It morphed into WinFS, then was dropped again so that Longhorn (now known as Vista) could make an August 2006 delivery.

But even that date has slipped. Vista won't be out now until February 2007. And according to some accounts, over half of Vista needs to be rewritten. That's from leaked internal information and "informed sources." And so the anti-Microsoft forces gleefully report the problems and chant ceaselessly about the coming downfall of Microsoft and the rise, yet again, of Linux. The only problem with reveling in someone else's misfortunes is that what goes around comes around. If we could harness all that energy anti-Microsoft folks want to expend trashing Microsoft, and put it towards really polishing the Linux desktop experience, then maybe, just maybe, Linux really would be a viable alternative to Windows. Instead of the perennial loser.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…