Skip to main content

The camera Olympus should have made

Plumbago Lab
Max with Plumbago blooms
About a week ago a NEX-5N arrived at the house with just the stock 18-55mm kit zoom. Today I finally received a Fotodiox OM-NEX lens adapter so that I could use my OM lenses with my NEX-5N. In order to use my manual focus OM film-era lenses with the 5N and the adapter I had to enable Release w/o Lens under Menu | Setup. I then selected Peaking Level of High and a Peaking Color of Red in the Setup menu. And then I went back to shooting raw.

Unless the subject is colored red, focus peaking works a treat with the 5N. This is the one feature above all others I would have liked Olympus to have added to its digital cameras, especially the Pens. I managed, after a fashion, to learn how to manually focus my OMs with my Pens (E-P2, E-PL1 and E-PL2), but it was a slow process. With the 5N focus peaking system, correct focus is absolute and certain, and for me at least a lot faster.

I've also noticed another feature I appreciate on the 5N, and that's its minimal lag when pressing the shutter release. For all practical purposes the 5N's shutter release is just as fast as the OM-4T's shutter release. Between the rapid manual focus and the quick shutter release, I finally have a digital back I can use with my OM film lenses. Right now I'm using the 1.4/50mm and 2.8/28mm, and usually stopped down one to two stops. Focus peaking allows me to quickly focus regardless of the composition or the aperture, no matter where my point of focus is located. With focus peaking I don't have to select an autofocus point in advance or touch a screen to select a focus point. With focus peaking I see instantly across the entire field what's in focus and what isn't. It may sound counter-intuitive, but with focus peaking my manual focusing is a lot more fluid and easier than any autofocus system I've used to date.
Fading Glow
If only Olympus had put an APS-C sensor in an OM-class body and given that to their OM users. Lord knows I would have bought at least one.

When I first purchased the 5N I had no intention of duplicating what I already have with my Pens. I just wanted a better way to use my OM lenses. I have all the focal lengths I really want or need in the Pen system. But I've had a chance to use the 5N with its focus peaking and I'm no longer quite so sure anymore about what I'll do with either the Pens or the Nexies.

The problem with leaving the Pens is the lack of equivalent quality lenses for the Nexies. I've grown to prefer the smaller, faster, lighter primes in the µ4:3rds system. I also know from my current experience that the Sony 18-55mm kit zoom is demonstrably inferior to the Olympus M.Zuiko 14-42mm kit zoom, and as a consequence have no real desire to invest in more Sony zooms. The Sony menu system, while certainly prettier than the Olympus menu system, is maddening in its own way when you have to go digging for features. Neither Olympus nor Sony builds a good menu system, but they are tolerable and get the job done.

But still and all the IQ of the 5N easily matches or exceeds anything the Pens can produce, can match or exceed the ISO range, and has focus peaking, a key feature I've been truly waiting for for some time. While Kirk Tuck may write glowingly of the NEX 7, I believe I may instead purchase a copy of the NEX 6 simply because I love what the Sony 5N's 16MP sensor can produce.

If I do nothing else with the 5N except use it as a digital back for my OM lenses, I consider the cost of the 5N to be money well spent.


  1. Interesting - and I'm almost glad that I've never seen focus peaking with my own eyes. Should/could be interesting on an Alpha 57 or 65 as well. And yes, both the Nex-6 and -7 are tempting. If only the lenses... but let's wait and see what will come out of the Sony/Olympus technology transfer.

    1. Wolfgang, I'm tired of waiting on Olympus.


Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…