Skip to main content

affordable tacos and affordable photography

PB050082-Edit
The affordable, discrete, rugged, and always-ready Panasonic GX1 with 14mm pancake.

I have experienced a barrage of new camera announcements for the last few months and today I reached a point of saturation. I realized just how well past tired I was of it all when the final official reveal of the new Nikon Df (which must stand for "Dumb fools", as that's the marketing niche it's aimed at) occurred today. When I read faux-tography sites such as Forbes gushing about how wonderful the Df was, then read the reactions of real photographers such as Tom Hogan (The Df very well may be the first camera marketed and sold to the AARP crowd) and Mike Johnston (Omigod, be careful what you wish for), I knew for certain that Nikon had finally jumped the shark. And a $3,000 dollar shark at that.

Me, I just wait at the trailing edge of photography, where everybody drops their old and busted gear for the new hotness, and then I just pick up perfectly good equipment for pennies on the dollar. Like, for example, the GX1 with its 14mm pancake. Total cost was about $380. That's still a bit stiff for a cheap skate like me, but it's a damn sight cheaper than the three damn grand that Nikon wants me to drop on their butt-ugly new hotness silver Nikon Df.

If I want to get all nostalgic and go all retro, hell, I'll just run the files out as black and white, add a little noise for the grain (like I'm still shooting Tri-X and developing it in D-76), and there I am, retro photos from a retro-price camera (I paid $450 for my black OM-4 with 50mm f/1.4 Zuiko in San Francisco back in 1984).

Out tonight with my wife partaking of Lime Grill's Taco Tuesday where I spent the princely sum of $10.68 for our two meals. Yeah, I'm a cheap date, but then my wife has known this for the past 33 years.

P1000667-Edit
P1000673-Edit

Comments

  1. This is a great post...sums up, even clarifies my approach too...Wait a year or two, or five...I picked up a really clean Canon 5D to satisfy my full frame jonesing, $500! And I just purchased a lightly used Panasonic G5 with kit lens for $250. Do I have state of the art AF or even sensors? No, but I've not heard anyone complain about the technical quality of any of my images...I am a 'second shooter' at weddings for some of my full pro friends....I take the shots of the groom tying his bow tie whilst watching a 'how to tie a bow tie' YouTube video on his smart phone etc. Please keep up your human and personal posts!

    Eugene

    ReplyDelete
  2. A good post and I totally agree. I like to call it behind the curve photography, and there is fantastic value in the market for previous models. Last year I bought an Olympus E-PL3 with kit lens for $300. And with a $60 3rd party adaptor I have access to all my existing lenses.

    When you think about it good photographers have been making great photographs since... photography was invented!

    When I see a new camera that I like the look of, such as the OMD-EM1, I think to myself, there's a camera I might buy used in 5 years time.

    For the time being I'm very happy with my E-PL3, and for a bit of nostalgia, my E-1, still capable of making fine 5MP images at ISO 100. Luckily I live in a sunny place!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, I still have an E-1 as well and a few regular 4:3rds lenses, especially the Zuiko Digital 50mm macro.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…