Skip to main content

Olympus At ISO 3200: No More Fear

Back in October of last year I wrote about "shooting at ISO 3200 with impunity" with the Sony NEX-5N and its 18-55mm kit lens. I wrote how I didn't feel that way with the Olympus cameras I had at that time. That's now changed.

Friday night, while on a fish taco run to Lime Mexican Grill, I happened to grab the photo above on the way in to eat. After looking at the results I'm here to say that I now feel that same sense of impunity with the Olympus E-M5. Granted, I used the Panasonic Lumix 20mm f/1.7 prime instead of a kit zoom, but the flip side is that the raw files are especially luscious coming out of the E-M5, and the 20mm has no distortions to speak of, especially compared to Sony's 18-55mm kit zoom. And I like the fact my 20mm prime is still two stops faster stopped down to f/2, than the equivalent focal length on the Sony zoom, 27mm at f/4 wide open). (No, I do not shoot any fast prime wide open unless I have no other choice. Old habits ingrained during my film days will never die).

Granted, DxOMark shows that the 5N's overall sensor score is 10 points higher than the overall score of the E-M5. But I'll take that "deficit" and run with it, since the E-M5's overall score is a good 20 points higher than every other 4:3rds and ยต4:3rds body olympus manufactured before the E-M5.

If Sony had poured as much ingenuity and manufacturing into affordable NEX prime lenses as they seem to into bodies, I'd be using Sony's near-equivalent 30mm f/1.7 prime on a NEX-6 or NEX-7 and lauding that combination in low light, instead of the Olympus E-M5 with the Panasonic Lumix 20mm.


  1. Looks good Bill. Oh and isn't f2 actually two stops faster than f4? Anyway - this looks like at least a two stop improvement (concerning noise and such) over my E-PL1. Oh, and at ISO 3200, do you still have headroom for exposure and/or curve corrections in the shadows?

    I guess what I would love the most about the E-M5 is the built-in viewfinder, on which I could mount an additional radio transmitter for the flashes. And yes, a Nex-6 or -7 would have those as well (and even better ones I guess), but those lenses would be missing. As would the IBIS.

    1. >> ...isn't f2 actually two stops faster than f4?

      Yes, 2, 2,8, 4. I can't count...

      Oh, and at ISO 3200, do you still have headroom for exposure and/or curve corrections in the shadows?

      It would appear so. I'm just happy to have what I see right now. I never tried to tweak the NEX files because I stayed strictly with the NEX JPEGS to take advantage of the NEX's internal lens corrections. And every time I went to touch a JPEG it just fell apart.

      My needs are remarkably modest and easily met by every current mirrorless camera. Mirrorless is where I want to be now on due to their small size and innocuous nature compared to "classic" DSLRs.


Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

A Decade Long Religious Con Job

I rarely write inflammatory (what some might call trolling) titles to a post, but this building you see before you deserves it. I've been seeing this building next to I-4 just east of Altamonte/436 and Crane's Roost for nearly 12 years, and never knew who owned it. Today on a trip up to Lake Mary with my wife I saw it yet again. That's when I told her I wanted to stop by on the way back and poke around the property, and photograph any parts of it if I could.

What I discovered was this still unfinished eighteen story (I counted) white elephant, overgrown with weeds and yet still under slow-motion construction. It looks impressive with its exterior glass curtain walls, but that impression is quickly lost when you see the unfinished lower stories and look inside to the unfinished interior spaces.

A quick check via Google leads to an article written in 2010 by the Orlando Sentinel about the Majesty Tower. Based on what I read in the article it's owned by SuperChannel 55 WA…

Be Careful of Capital One Mailings

Capitol One ("What's in your wallet?") sent me a bit of deceptive snail mail today. I felt sure it was a credit card offer, and sure enough, it was. I open all credit card offers and shred them before putting them in the trash. Normally I just scan the front to make sure I don't miss anything; the Capital One offer made me stop for a moment and strike a bit of fear into my heart.

The letter's opening sentence read:
Our records as of December 30, 2009 indicate your Capital One Platinum MasterCard offer is currently valid and active.Not paying close attention during the first reading, I quickly developed this irrational worry that I was actually on the hook for something important, but I wasn't quite sure what. The letter listed "three ways to reply" at the bottom; via phone, the internet, and regular snail mail. I elected to call.

Once I reached the automated phone response system, the first entry offered was '1', to "activate my Capital …

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…