Skip to main content



This post and the following posts are a confluence of odd events. Let me explain a bit.

Before this post I had written Matthew that I wouldn't tweet or photography or blog throughout the upcoming week because I was going on vacation and I was pretty much burned out, and I needed a "recharge." But as life would have it, my resolve died rather quickly. Matthew had just written a review of his new Ricoh GR, which I re-read after I wrote Matthew and it triggered a memory of my Sony NEX-5N with its pair of Sigma E-mount lenses, and so, inspired (or jealous, your call), I went back to where I had it all stored and pulled it all out and started to drive around with it. I always carry a camera with me in the Prius, specifically the Olympus E-M5, but I hadn't been getting much use out of it except for the Cloud Lab blimp. I figured what the hell, change up the gear and see what happens.

And then I ran across Lee Reamsnyder's "Your Eye Is Not A Camera" post (very good) and in that post is a link to Garry Winogrand. And when I read about Winogrand it took me back to my first intense fling with photography back in Atlanta during the 1970s and how I used to buy 100 ft rolls of Tri-X (it was dirt cheap back then) and load my own 35mm cartridges (a technique I taught daughter #2 some 35 years later, in the late 2000s for her college film photography class at FSU) and shoot roll after roll because I could and because I was in charge of the college darkroom (with free and nearly limitless supplies of developer and paper) and I had no life except around photography at the time.

Unlike Winogrand I didn't wait to develop my rolls. I developed them and made thousands of contact prints. I have exactly one slim three-ring volume of negatives in acid-free sleeves sitting on my shelf from that period, split between 35mm and 120/220 (I had a Mamiya 330 pro f as well at that time). I did all that photography at the time for the same reason Winogrand did, to see what Atlanta and its surrounding environment "would look like as photographs." One critical difference being that everybody remembers Winogrand but nobody (outside my immediate family) remembers me.

And it re-opened, triggered in part by Matthew's 5Kphoto project (long finished and inspired in part by me he says) this deep upwelling to photograph, and all of a sudden I found myself with the Sony and acting like it was the 1970's all over again, photographing around Orlando just to see what it looks like photographed, like I'd never taken a single photograph before that point in time. And I'm going to be doing that for a while. After all, this is the digital age, and I have all the tools I need. And the whole world in front of me.

The title of this post is taken in part from the movie of the same name. What impressed me in the movie were the sweeping vistas (taken in Iceland) mixed in via special effects a buried New Your city. Utter desolation. That's what I feel driving around Orlando these days. The real beauty of the living landscape has long since been obliterated, covered over by the profoundly ugly works of man.



Taken with the Sony NEX 5N and the Sigma 30mm f/2.8, with the 30mm wide open. This gives an equivalent 35mm PoV of 45mm, or nearly equivalent to 50mm, or 40mm for some. If you understand all this you're damned if you do, and if you don't you're damned if you don't. Oh, and the NEX 5N won a gold award from DPreview, which goes to underscore Matthew's point that my 5N "was new and shiny once, too."


  1. Very good and strong point, and the photos are the same.

  2. Hi Bill. Interesting to read a little about Garry Winogrand on your blog. He's a huge inspiration to me. Hope all's well.

  3. Hello, Hank! It's been a really long time. I just checked out your sites and I hope that all is continuing to go well with you up in and around Boston.


Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…