Skip to main content

standards, fairness, and openess

Street Machine
Street machine - Olympus E-M5 with Panasonic Lumix 14mm f/2.5
Every once in a while (far less than I should) I mosey over to Wolfgang Lonien's blog and check a different photographer's perspective from half way around the world.


Wolfgang lives in Germany and views the world through a far different cultural lens than I. On the majority of issues I find we are in surprisingly close agreement (which I think goes to show, perhaps a little unfortunately, the over-homogenisation of world cultures). One of those issues we seem to agree on concerns technological openness, in this case concerning digital cameras and post processing software.

Wolfgang is a strong believer in open systems and open software. He practices what he preaches, choosing to use Debian at home and supporting Redhat where he works. At home he uses dcraw to process his raw images from his Olympus cameras, feeding the results into RawTherapee. Both of these applications are open source software.

Wolfgang noted in one of his latest posts, "Fuji is the new Leica", that his concern with using the latest Fuji cameras (such as the new X100s, although I did see it supported for the older X100) is Fuji's lack of decent support for dcraw, the front end that processes the raw files. His concern is justified, not so much because of Fuji's lack of raw support for dcraw, but poor third-party raw support in general. I don't know now many posts I've read by users lamenting the lack of decent raw support, especially in Adobe of all applications.

I agree with Wolfgang's sentiment when he says "Zack’s idea (“outsource your software to Adobe”) isn’t the best one..." I don't trust Adobe. I don't trust anyone who controls key tools that help me work with my photography. I don't like the idea that somebody could arbitrarily and capriciously one day decide that because I'm not paying enough, or not doing things quite the way they want, that my access to the tools that allow me to work with my raw photography would suddenly cease to exist. That's a very short step away from denying me complete access to everything because my work, for convenience sake, is stored up in the same cloud with those tools.

It's those kinds of concerns that have led me to adopt the following rule: Trust but Back Up[1] if I have to live in the cloud. With the notable exception of email primarily I do everything locally on my computers. This especially includes my photography. While I may have thousands of photos on Flickr, I don't use Flickr as a backup. I don't use the cloud as a backup for anything.

I think Wolfgang and I are both being swayed by the Fuji siren song, backed up by the Leica legend, especially when we hear how Leica-like the Fuji is. I have pretty much developed a resistance to the Fuji attraction that doesn't involve having me lashed to a ship's mast. I've been disappointed by enough by too many past promises that I've become pretty much inoculated to the current level of hype coming from Fuji's direction. For me photography is more than just hype, a fad. Fuji bears too much of both for comfort.

Instead, I go and grab the Panasonic 14mm and put it on one of my Pens, especially the E-M5, and I go out and photograph. A lot. With its 28mm equivalent field of view a little wider than the equivalent 35mm FoV the Fuji X100s provides, it's bright enough and good enough for street work (to be honest it's about 2/3rds of a stop slower than the Fuji's f/2 maximum aperture, but the E-M5's excellent high-ISO performance helps compensate for this). Gaff up the white paint on the body and a camera that's already pretty inconspicuous almost disappears in your hands. The E-M5 is fast and silent and has amazing high ISO quality coupled with its five-axis IBIS. And when you're done, dcraw supports your E-M5 raw files if that's what you need.

Right now I'm beginning to reduce my dependency on Lightroom and switching more to just taking what comes from in-camera. If I need to tweak anything I use Olympus Viewer 2 on the old Macbook. That use is primarily rescaling the JPEGs in the camera, and I could probably use RawTherapee for that. For deeper work I need to check the dcraw to RawTherapee work flow. My major concern there is dcraw's lack of use of the lens correction information built into ยต4:3rds raw files for all the lenses. That correction is applied silently by Adobe, but not so (at least in the past) by dcraw/RawTherapee. That may have changed since the last time I tried RawTherapee. If it doesn't, then I don't know what my alternatives currently are because a number of those lenses can produce some serious barrel distortion without correction.

All this writing comes down to a deep desire on my part not to loose control over what's mine. I want control of the entire creative photographic tool chain, from the camera to the finished file. I don't like anyone standing in the middle who might break that chain.

[1] A variation of Russian leader Vladimir Lenin's, and later President Ronald Regan's "Trust, but Verify" proverb.


Popular posts from this blog

A Decade Long Religious Con Job

I rarely write inflammatory (what some might call trolling) titles to a post, but this building you see before you deserves it. I've been seeing this building next to I-4 just east of Altamonte/436 and Crane's Roost for nearly 12 years, and never knew who owned it. Today on a trip up to Lake Mary with my wife I saw it yet again. That's when I told her I wanted to stop by on the way back and poke around the property, and photograph any parts of it if I could.

What I discovered was this still unfinished eighteen story (I counted) white elephant, overgrown with weeds and yet still under slow-motion construction. It looks impressive with its exterior glass curtain walls, but that impression is quickly lost when you see the unfinished lower stories and look inside to the unfinished interior spaces.

A quick check via Google leads to an article written in 2010 by the Orlando Sentinel about the Majesty Tower. Based on what I read in the article it's owned by SuperChannel 55 WA…

Be Careful of Capital One Mailings

Capitol One ("What's in your wallet?") sent me a bit of deceptive snail mail today. I felt sure it was a credit card offer, and sure enough, it was. I open all credit card offers and shred them before putting them in the trash. Normally I just scan the front to make sure I don't miss anything; the Capital One offer made me stop for a moment and strike a bit of fear into my heart.

The letter's opening sentence read:
Our records as of December 30, 2009 indicate your Capital One Platinum MasterCard offer is currently valid and active.Not paying close attention during the first reading, I quickly developed this irrational worry that I was actually on the hook for something important, but I wasn't quite sure what. The letter listed "three ways to reply" at the bottom; via phone, the internet, and regular snail mail. I elected to call.

Once I reached the automated phone response system, the first entry offered was '1', to "activate my Capital …

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…