Skip to main content

You spent how much???

My youngest and I went to see Avatar today. According to her, "it's just a bloodier version of Fern Gully." My oldest has subtitled it "Dances with Fern Gully." And without Robin Williams as Batty Koda for comedy relief. But everything else is there; instead of fairies in a tree you have nine-foot-tall Na'vi in a Home Tree. In Fern Gully the protagonist is shrunk so he can interact with the fairies, while in Avatar the protagonist is wired into an artificial version of the Na'vi so he can interact with the "in-digs". It's a highly predictable movie wrapped in a lot of very expensive eye candy (which, according to published accounts, cost anywhere from $200 to $500 million to make). After sitting through the movie I came out with an attitude that can be best summed up by this shot of Neytiri, except instead of Col. Quaritch lined up on the arrow, I'm imagining it's James Cameron.

Since my list for the good parts of this movie is far shorter than my list for the bad parts, I'll just cover the shorter list. That list contains only two items: the performances of Sigourney Weaver and Sam Worthington.

I've enjoyed Sigourney Weaver's movies, particularly the Alien and Ghostbusters series. I also had a blast watching her as Gwen DeMarco in Galaxy Quest. She's always been smart and sexy in everything I've seen her in, and in Galaxy Quest she was smokin'. In Avatar, as Dr. Grace Augustine, she brings maturity and sophistication to an ensemble that is severely lacking in both (or at least not allowed to develop any similar capabilities). I first saw Sam Worthington in Terminator 4, where he acted rings around Christian Bale. What he lacks in Sigourney-style maturity and sophistication he more than makes up with in earnest energy. Call me old fashioned, but I respond a lot more to good acting and a good plot; I guess I should be satisfied with one out of two.

I'll say this much for Worthington's character, he puts a new spin on "going native" at the end of the movie.

Edit 1

What bugs me more than anything about Avatar is a key 'plot' element, and that's the inability of normal humans to breath unaided in Pandora's atmosphere. The atmosphere is certainly rich enough to support large intelligent beings, as well as very large sophisticated flying life forms. I also saw human-manufactured flying machines that appeared to be getting part of the fuel from the air (you know, like oxygen). I saw lots of burning, and in one scene what appeared to be a flame thrower. Finally, if our descendants are capable of turning human DNA into avatars that are identical with the native-born Na'vi, then why can't they do something simpler, like giving regular humans a pair of lungs capable of working unaided in Pandora's atmosphere?

Edit 2

After sleeping on what I'd seen in Avatar, I awoke with more questions and an even deeper dislike of the movie. Regarding the treatment of the Na'vi, I take a more Harlan Ellison view towards what might happen if a technologically superior force (us) meets another stone-age culture (the Na'vi).

Again, if humans have that ability to create and control fully grown avatars, then they certainly have the ability to conduct brutally effective biological warfare against the natives, as that would have been the most effective manner for killing them. An example from our own history can be found here, where it appears that in 1763, General Amherst and Colonel Henry Bouquet write about the use of blankets infected with smallpox "to Extirpate this Execrable Race." I cannot believe that if the Na'vi had been sitting on something as valuable as "unobtainium", and if the home world (Earth) was in such dire straights, that the in-country human population wouldn't have hesitated in the least to remove the natives, by whatever means deemed as efficient and effective as possible. No warning would have been given, no kindness extended.

Which leads me to wonder what Harlan Ellison thinks of this film?

Edit 3

Because Avatar seems to borrow so heavily from so many other films that I've seen over the past decades, it's inevitable that I should find key similarities with those films. That happened to me today as I was standing with the Labs at a local PetSmart waiting to have their annual Christmas photos. For whatever reason 1981's "Outland", with Sean Connery and Peter Boyle, bubbled up into my conscience. What probably helped triggered memory of this movie is the scene in Avatar where Giovanni Ribisi's character was putting golf balls into a cup. Peter Boyle's character was also into golf, and in fact had a virtual green in his office. Other parallels included the type of location: Pandora is a moon around a gas giant, while Outland took place in a base on Io, again a moon around a gas giant (in this case Jupiter). There's even a strong parallel with the Outland's Dr. Lasarus (played by Frances Sternhagen) and Weaver's Dr. Augustine; both are tough, independent, fearless, and just a little profane. Finally, Sternhagen and Weaver are both seasoned pros who put in excellent performances in their respective roles.


  1. Hahaha fern gully. Classic. I showed a buddy of mine who already saw the movie this particular blog and he had a good laugh and agreed with you wholeheartedly.


Post a Comment

All comments are checked. Comment SPAM will be blocked and deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

cat-in-a-box channels greta garbo

So I'm sitting at my computer, when I start to notice a racket in back. I ignore it for a while until I hear a load "thump!", as if something had been dropped on the floor, followed by a lot of loud rattling. I turn around and see Lucy in the box just having a grand old time, rolling around and rattling that box a good one. I grab the GX1 and snap a few shots before she notices me and the camera, then leaps out and back into her chair (which used to be my chair before she decided it was her chair).

Just like caring for Katie my black Lab taught me about dogs, caring for Lucy is teaching me about cats. She finds me fascinating, as I do her. And she expresses great affection and love toward me without coaxing. I try to return the affection and love, but she is a cat, and she takes a bat at me on occasion, although I think that's just her being playful. She always has her claws in when she does that.

She sits next to me during the evening in her chair while I sit in mi…

vm networking problem fixed

Over the weekend I upgraded to Windows 8.1, then discovered that networking for the virtual machines wouldn't work. Then I tried something incredibly simple and fixed the problem.

Checking the system I noticed that three VMware Windows services weren't running; VMnetDHCP, VMUSBArbService, and VMwareNatService. VMware Player allows you to install, remove, or fix an existing installation. I chose to try fixing the installation, and that fixed the problem. The services were re-installed/restarted, and the virtual machines had networking again.

Once network connectivity was established there was exactly one updated file for Ubuntu 13.10, a data file. This underscores how solid and finished the release was this time. Every other version of every other Linux installation I've ever dealt with has always been succeeded by boatloads of updates after the initial installation. But not this time.

Everything is working properly on my notebook. All's right with the world.

sony's pivotal mirrorless move

I'm a died-in-the-wool technologist, even when it comes to photography. I have always been fascinated with the technology that goes into manufacturing any camera, from the lenses (optics) through the mechanical construction, the electronics involved, and especially the chemistry of the film and the sophistication of the digital sensor. It's amazing that the camera can do all it's asked of it, regardless of manufacturer.

Of all the types of cameras that I've really taken an interest in, contemporary mirrorless (again, regardless of manufacturer) are the most interesting because of the challenging problems the scientists and engineers have had to solve in order to build a compact but highly functional camera. In particular I've followed the sensor advances over the years and watched image quality climb (especially with μ4:3rds) to exceed film and rival one another such that there's very little difference any more as you move from the smaller sensors such as 4:3r…